[getty src=”461082856″ width=”594″ height=”396″]
NHS hospitals have big and fundamental challenges, it is true. It’s partly a regular-as-clockwork winter peak. Partly desperate and wrong-headed underfunding. Partly a consequence of pressure on GP services, despite more money recently being promised.
The Red Cross have for many many years assisted hospitals look after patients when they are discharged and return home. It has always been a constructive and valuable partnership. These trained volunteers are part of what used to be known by some as the “big society.”
There are some areas of our life where there is an argument for state provision, but actually, collectively, we are happier pitching in and doing it for ourselves. The Red Cross is one such example, The RNLI is another. The National Trust is a third (though, of course, you’d have to pay to be a member).
So the Red Cross is not a replacement for the NHS, and nor is it an emergency relief. And their concerns need to be seen in that context. In the area of patient discharge and domestic return/resettlement, the Red Cross has hit the red button.
Patients medically ready for discharge but not being “signed out” for hours – thus blocking much needed beds. Care plans not being drawn up or properly supported so that when patients return home they are vulnerable. Insufficient home support exacerbates that vulnerability. The chance of people in this position requiring re-hospitalisation is clearly and greatly increased as a result.
So we have a vicious circle of poor social care leading to stretched-to-breaking point medical care.
And of course this is not the only source of tension. In amongst funding and seasonal spikes in ill-health, it is worth looking at the use of hospital services: 2m non-urgent visits to A & E in 2014. So you can see why Jeremy Hunt is trying to filter these out of the wait-time statistics. Partly it is because they are the only places open for health care on a 24 hour basis and, also unlike your GP, you don’t need to make an appointment. The NHS “111” helpline seems to have a low thresh-hold for directing callers to hospital (and you can understand why). On-site, out of hours services, such as Walk-in Centres or Minor Injuries Units undoubtedly help (with 7m attendances a year, according to official figures), but coverage is uneven and reducing.
As a society we have conspired to heap intense pressure on hospital services. Is it really a surprise when they threaten to fall over?
And it is an old trick – set something up to fail and then say it can’t work, and that we need an alternative. And is this context we know what that private-sector, run-for-profit, alternative would be. So we need to take great care in the language we use, lest we create a self-fulfilling prophecy.
However, there is still a huge national consensus in favour of care provided free at the point of delivery and the principle of the NHS itself. Why then the gap between what we say we want and what we are prepared to pay for?
Could it be that we simply do not want to acknowledge the fundamental economic importance of social care, or that it is an essential component of a functional society, not an optional add-on? Politicians do not want to engage with the unavoidable need to raise taxation and possibly we do not want to embrace the inevitability of us and our families needing care, especially as we/they become older and more frail.
And that is why, serious as it is, it is not the NHS that is most exposed in this real and difficult set of circumstances. It is society itself. You can’t have a mantra of sharing when you’re in denial about what makes society work. You can’t provide leadership without having a grown up discussion about tax and social care. That’s the mother of all crises.